Sunday, November 23, 2014

King of the Jews or King of Kings?

  King of the Jews or King of Kings?
A sermon by Rev. Douglas Olds
Sojourner Truth Presbyterian Church, Richmond, CA
Christ the King Sunday, November 23, 2014
Podcast

Ezekiel 34. 11-24 For thus says the Lord GOD: I myself will search for my sheep, and will seek them out. 12 As shepherds seek out their flocks when they are among their scattered sheep, so I will seek out my sheep. I will rescue them from all the places to which they have been scattered on a day of clouds and thick darkness. 13 I will bring them out from the peoples and gather them from the countries, and will bring them into their own land; and I will feed them on the mountains of Israel, by the watercourses, and in all the inhabited parts of the land. 14 I will feed them with good pasture, and the mountain heights of Israel shall be their pasture; there they shall lie down in good grazing land, and they shall feed on rich pasture on the mountains of Israel. 15 I myself will be the shepherd of my sheep, and I will make them lie down, says the Lord GOD. 16 I will seek the lost, and I will bring back the strayed, and I will bind up the injured, and I will strengthen the weak, but the fat and the strong I will destroy. I will feed them with justice.
17 As for you, my flock, thus says the Lord GOD: I shall judge between sheep and sheep, between rams and goats: 18 Is it not enough for you to feed on the good pasture, but you must tread down with your feet the rest of your pasture? When you drink of clear water, must you foul the rest with your feet? 19 And must my sheep eat what you have trodden with your feet, and drink what you have fouled with your feet? 
20 Therefore, thus says the Lord GOD to them: I myself will judge between the fat sheep and the lean sheep. 21 Because you pushed with flank and shoulder, and butted at all the weak animals with your horns until you scattered them far and wide, 22 I will save my flock, and they shall no longer be ravaged; and I will judge between sheep and sheep.
23 I will set up over them one shepherd, my servant David, and he shall feed them: he shall feed them and be their shepherd. 24 And I, the LORD, will be their God, and my servant David shall be prince among them; I, the LORD, have spoken.



Ephesians 1:15–23 15 I have heard of your faith in the Lord Jesus and your love toward all the saints, and for this reason 16 I do not cease to give thanks for you as I remember you in my prayers. 17 I pray that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give you a spirit of wisdom and revelation as you come to know him, 18 so that, with the eyes of your heart enlightened, you may know what is the hope to which he has called you, what are the riches of his glorious inheritance among the saints, 19 and what is the immeasurable greatness of his power for us who believe, according to the working of his great power. 20 God put this power to work in Christ when he raised him from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly places, 21 far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the age to come. 22 And he has put all things under his feet and has made him the head over all things for the church, 23 which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all.






Today is the last Sunday in the Church’s lectionary year A, as Presbyterians read through the Bible in a three year cycle.  Next Sunday begins the Season of Advent and the start of Lectionary Year B. Advent starts with the church empathizing with Judean peasants anticipating deliverance from oppression and looking out for a deliverer. 

As we move from Advent’s anticipation, we weekly read through Jesus’ revelation as the miracle working Son of Man and teacher of subversive wisdom, later hear his question to his disciple Peter, who do you say that I am? (Mt  16.15).   

After the Cross, Peter is confronted by a servant-girl who accuses him of being in league with the Crucified one.   Peter denies, saying “I do not know the man.” (Mt 26.74). 

The Lectionary year climaxes with the Resurrection and then the church goes on in the rest of the yearly reading cycle to try to make sense of it all:

the prophecies, the teachings, sin, grace and mercy,
 the creation of the church, and the prediction of an end time where God transforms the earth with the promise of judgment, the triumph of justice, and the life after death.
So now, we are at the 52nd Sunday of Lectionary Year A and here is where the church of disciples concludes with its answer to Jesus’s question to his chief disciple,
“Who do you say that I am?”  

We in the Presbyterian Church use many names for God and many names for the Trinity power of the Son.In the Bible, Jesus is called by many names and titles.
 Jesus is Rabbi, Master, Word, Son of Man, Suffering Servant, Son of God;
Christ is Prince of Peace, Lord, Savior, God Incarnate, Bread of Life, Ancient of Days, Bridegroom, Cornerstone, Emmanuel, First and Last, High Priest, Lamb of God.

Yet this Sunday in the yearly cycle, our Church has named, “Christ the King, or Reign of Christ” Sunday where our church confesses:

“Christ Jesus, we say that you are King over all.”  

Naming Christ Jesus as a King--a King of Kings--involves a political as well as religious commitment. It is a dangerous act which risks in the world a different kind of politics for the sake of a different kind of world.

After a pastor in Texas was shot by the husband of a woman in the congregation with whom the pastor was having an affair, a group of pastors last year debated whether it was permissible or even prudent for pastors to carry concealed guns.[1]  Some conservative pastors agreed that it was okay to carry a gun and conceal it under their robes and garments, and to arm their congregants likewise during worship. 

I argued otherwise. 

One pastor proposed that Jesus indeed carried a weapon.  
Ps 144 starts off,  Blessed be the LORD, my rock,  who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle.  
The gun wielding pastor argued that this is David speaking, and that David is a “type” for Christ, so that Christ is trained for deathly battle.  This argument goes along with the idea that the Book of Revelation describes an earthly battle and a Christ bloodied with the stains of his enemies. 
A retired general who leads a conservative organization asserted elsewhere that Christ comes back to earth blazing an AR-15 assault rifle.[2]

King David was a military leader who felt that he had escaped so many deaths in battle that he attributed his life and leadership to God whom he calls his Rock to which he could flee in danger. After all of his violent battling and serial murders,[3] David’s later years were haunted by chronic sin and family dysfunction. 

His son Solomon inherited David’s throne, got off to a good start, but in his later life he participated in the idolatries and false worship of his harem wives and indulged in militaristic display, trading with arch enemy Egypt to amass chariots and horses.

300 years after Solomon, the last good king of Judah, Josiah, was presented a rediscovered book of the Covenant in the Temple, which was what we call Deuteronomy.

 Deuteronomy Chapter 17 details a law for the King. There, we learn that the ancient Israelites were concerned with overweening , aggressive, and wealth seeking in their leaders.  This critique of kingship is one of the most important themes of the Deuteronomic scriptures. From the foundation of the institution of kingship in Biblical Israel, kings were judged for their failure to bring in God’s blessings of security and sustenance to the common people which was living worship of a living God. 

According to Deuteronomy 17, the Law of the King, the King must not have too many horses, wives, or gold. He must study the Torah law daily under the instruction of the priests.  Yet few kings or political leaders drawn from the rich and powerful have complied.

From our Old Testament reading this morning, we see Ezekiel’s prophetic critique of the political leaders who are the shepherds of the people.  The Israelite shepherds-- its political leaders--played favorites with the rich and overstuffed sheep, allowing them to take all the pasture and befoul the water of the deprived sheep. 

Ezekiel notes that God himself will search for his sheep. And he will judge between sheep.  God will appoint a shepherd over his sheep to feed them. This role for the just king is consistent with what we read in Psalm 72:

   Ps 72. 1      Give the king your justice, O God,
    and your righteousness to a king’s son.
    2      May he judge your people with righteousness,
    and your poor with justice.
    3      May the mountains yield prosperity for the people,
    and the hills, in righteousness.
    4      May he defend the cause of the poor of the people,
    give deliverance to the needy,
    and crush the oppressor.

Jesus throughout the Gospels identifies with the poor, sick, and oppressed (Luke 4),
and gives his disciple Peter the task to feed his sheep (John 21).  Jesus exceeds the requirements of the law of the King by forgoing wives, military arms, and money. He practices the virtue of asceticism—forgoing earthly pleasures and the fortified walls of security.  Jesus is the ultimate trustworthy leader by the values of the Old Testament. The New Testament is relaying the shocking good news, “the story of a new king, a new kind of king, a king who has changed everything, and a king who invites us to be part of his new world.”[4]

In the Letter to the Ephesians, the Apostle Paul makes the claim that Jesus is now seated as the Christ, the anointed king, at God’s right hand.  The right hand of the host was a place of honor at a banquet, yet also the right hand held the sword in battle.Christ, not David, is at the right hand of God and is the implement of God’s victory.

Earlier I noted that Psalm 110 sings that David’s lord sits at the right hand of God, as part of his enthronement as King.  Paul in his Letter to the Ephesians is identifying David’s lord as a superior king, the King of Kings, the real right hand of God.

It is not haunted militarist David but the sinless and whole Jesus Christ who holds the weaponry and applies the mercy of God. David’s violent military power is subservient to Christ’s power, which is the power of non-violence and forgiveness. 

Paul in Ephesians identifies Christ in charge of all powers and principalities, so that forgiveness follows military action carried out to feed the shepherd’s sheep. Who are the Shepherding King’s sheep? Ezekiel 34 notes that the common good of the nation has been ruined by the excesses of greedy sheep.  Christ as King of Kings in control over the powers and principalities of nations subjects them to judgment for their effectiveness and justice in establishing the common good, which includes feeding and watering the deprived and undernourished. 

Therefore, I think that all political power--whether kingly or constitutional, whether military or angelic--is subject to the requirement of the just shepherd to feed all of Christ’s sheep:

Ezekiel 34.15 I myself will be the shepherd of my sheep, and I will make them lie down, says the Lord GOD.
16 I will seek the lost, and I will bring back the strayed, and I will bind up the injured, and I will strengthen the weak,
but the fat and the strong I will destroy. I will feed them with justice.
 
War and violence in furtherance of further enriching the greedy sheep while neglecting the deprived sheep fail the test of righteous leadership. Wars of aggression to enrich corporations while letting battlefield veterans to return to joblessness and homelessness fail the test of leadership. This is the King of King’s message for societal justice and the common good.

 Ezekiel says to the wealthy masters,

34.18 When you drink of clear water, must you foul the rest with your feet?

Yet in this country and state, clean water is being fouled by the industry of fracking.[5]  Clean water, historically a plentiful resource, is being turned into a scarce resource by the greedy exploitation of corporate and government powers.   Detroit, a city split along racial and economic lines, is suffering a clean water crisis as costs escalate out of the ability of its unemployed poor to pay.[6] 

God gives rain as grace to the just and the unjust alike (Mt 5.45), Jesus says, yet some who consider themselves righteous by the standards of wealth and power deny God’s grace of clean water to those who are unable to pay. The CEO of mega-conglomerate Nestle proposes to privatize water for corporate profits.[7] 

This is how finance intensive capitalism is functioning: creating scarcity through pollution, while proposing to allocate the now scarce resource according to the standard of willingness to pay weighted by ability to pay.  The corporate animals are dirtying the water of the deprived sheep as they make it more expensive.

Their wealth is increased by others’ “illth.”

A second implication of our calling Christ King is what Martin Luther called “Two Kingdom” theology.  That is, the sheep of Christ live by the non-violent and prayerful ethic of the Sermon on the Mount, while those who don’t identify with being the sheep of Christ are ethically subject to the judgment of kingdom of Heaven for their use of state violence and war. 

The principle of justice for those outside the peaceful flock is their answer to the Judge’s question: does this warring action help the poor, the blind, the imprisoned, and the oppressed?[8]  Political leaders with access to the state’s monopoly on violence will be judged for their violations of justice and the common good.

For the designers of war, it is good and necessary to keep in mind that Jesus said in John 10.16,

I have other sheep that do not belong to this fold. I must bring them also, and they will listen to my voice.

I believe since God is the God of the whole earth, it is imperative never to target non-combatants who are following the Sermon on the Mount ethic of non-hostility— for they may be the non-violent sheep of another fold. 

The collateral targeting of wedding parties and family members of insurgents in Pakistan and Yemen by U.S. drones[9] fails this two kingdom theology of Christ the Shepherd King of the Peaceable Kingdom. This violation of the peaceful and meek brings forth Christ the Judging King of the Warrior class. Political leaders plotting to target for assassination practitioners of non-violence like the Occupy Movement[10] and Martin Luther King[11] face the same judgment.

These are the two kingdoms with Christ lord overall:  the non-violent world subject to the hope of grace and the subservient kingdom of the weapon subject to the judgment of justice.

I congratulate this community of Richmond by turning away the political designs of Chevron in the recent election.  I believe this country needs to turn back the grant of power to corporations and return it to democratic community.
I am given hope by the California voters for passing Proposition 47 that reduces prison terms for certain non-violent crimes. 
I hope we see may see Christ our King working through these victories.

A third implication of calling Christ our King comes from a theology of the Cross. 
Usually we speak of the Cross as the place where Jesus’ pronouncements of abandonment accompanied by forgiveness triumphed, and/or where Jesus took on the penalty of the accumulated sin-debt of humanity in some manner of substitution or sacrifice to an angry God. 

But I think there is another facet to a theology of the Cross, which is how the Roman imperial power validated Jesus’ earthly ministry by condemning it.  

Pontius Pilate turned Jesus’s question to Peter around, by asking him, “Are you the King of the Jews?”

Jesus answered, σὺ λέγεις  You yourself say so (Luke 22.70).

Pilate thus places his answer to Jesus’ identity on the sign he ordered hung on the Cross:
 INRI, Iēsus Nazarēnus, Rēx Iūdaeōrum (Mt 27.37). 

INRI, dead, is how violent imperial power saw Jesus: 

As a teacher of subversion, a would be but failed king, hanging dead for the world to see.

This is how violent power will always see Jesus on the Cross: 
as their victory—
Jesus is INRI, King of the Jews: a failed, dead, would be king.

From the Cross we learn that Jesus’s teachings were recognized by established and oppressive power as subversive and thus dangerous to its continuing.From the Cross, we learn that Jesus’ earthly teachings were the foundation of the deadly opposition from worldly power to his spiritual and political Kingship. 

Christ says we will see him in his glory.

 The kingdom and the cross are linked, where we see Christ in his earthly kingly glory, a mix of suffering and triumphing, refusing to curse and therefore never oppressing. 

Did Peter really know who Jesus was when he blurted out, “You are the son of the living God” (Mt 16.16)?  Did Pilate know really know Jesus, when he placed his sign: Jesus the king of the Jews? Or rather does Peter’s three times denial after the Crucifixion demonstrate that he really didn’t know who Jesus was?  

Peter’s claim under duress, “I don’t know him,” may be more truthful than we often preach. Peter expected something from Jesus besides his crucifixion.

 What does Christ Jesus the King look like?

For me, these lessons have us look for him on Earth from those currently experiencing the drama of Cross, suffering and forgiving. Christ reserves to himself revealing his heavenly glory as judge when we come, as promised (Rev 22.4), face to face with him.

Are we like Peter, thinking we know what a King of Kings looks like, but we don’t really know the inner thoughts and judgments of the person who is destined to become King of Kings? 

Some Christians I know say they just want others to see Christ in them. I have learned it may be more important to try instead to point out Christ in the world, sometimes suffering, sometimes triumphing.
 I take the Holy Spirit’s call to diligently try to find Christ in the scriptures, follow his words that point out that he lives in the world in the powerless and oppressed today.

 On earth, our king is the unkempt and homeless stranger,
 emaciated by malnutrition and illness,
haunted by solitary confinement,
traumatic stress, overwork, and mental illness.  

“Crown him with many crowns…Crown him the Lord of Love…Crown him the Lord of peace, whose power a scepter sways
“From pole to pole, that wars may cease…his reign shall know no end.” 

In Jesus’ day, there was no distinction between religion and politics. I think as we look to the Kingdom of Heaven, we recognize for the King’s disciples that there is no distinction between religion and politics. Being disciples of the one we call King of Kings is a political and religious act and has political as well as religious demands.

We Christ’s disciples use the methods of non-violence to loosen the concrete grip of self-serving, greedy mammon over the resources needed for living by the majority of Christ’s people, the people who are undergoing the drama and trauma of the Cross on a daily basis. King language accepts and acts on Jesus’s risky political involvement and messages.

Thanks be to God that we who are blessed with life and living hope from our faith and the testimony of a cloud of witnesses (Heb 12.1-2)  to the resurrection of the Son of Man who has become King of Kings:

Jesus Christ who is revealed to be the author and bearer of human salvation, the redeemer from the curse of death.

He is risen and living among us and with God, who sends the Holy Spirit from unseen light for guiding and sustaining our mission to love and assist others into his Kingdom.

Trinitarian power, mysterious and wonderful. 

“Arise, shine, for your light is come!
Fling wide the prison door,
Proclaim the captive’s liberty
Good tidings to the poor.
Arise, shine for your light is come,
Rise up like eagles on the wing,
Bind up the broken-hearted ones.
God’s power will make us strong!"




[1] http://douglasolds.blogspot.com/2013/10/does-your-pastor-carry-concealed-weapon.html
[2] http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/boykin-when-jesus-comes-back-hell-be-carrying-ar-15-assault-rifle
[3] Baruch Halpern, David's Secret Demons: Messiah, Murderer, Traitor, King. 2003
[4] N.T. Wright, How God Became King: The Forgotten Story of the Gospels.
[5] http://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations/Waste-Water-from-Oil-Fracking-Injected-into-Clean-Aquifers-282733051.html?utm_content=buffer8df11&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
[6] http://www.democracynow.org/2014/10/10/detroit_faces_humanitarian_crisis_as_city
[7] http://www.whydontyoutrythis.com/2013/05/nestle-ceo-water-is-not-a-human-right-should-be-privatized.html
[8] What John Rawls in The Theory of Justice calls the “maximin” principle of distribution of scarce moral goods.
[9] https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/11/18/media-outlets-continue-describe-unknown-drone-victims-militants/
[10]http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/redacted_fbi_document_shows_plot_to_kill_occupy_leaders_20130629
[11] http://www.thekingcenter.org/assassination-conspiracy-trial

Saturday, November 8, 2014

Empty Lamp Religion

Empty Lamp Religion
A sermon by Rev. Douglas Olds
First Presbyterian Church of Vallejo (CA)
November 9, 2014


Matthew 25:1-13 NRSV
 “Then the kingdom of heaven will be like this. Ten bridesmaids took their lamps and went to meet the bridegroom. 2 Five of them were foolish, and five were wise. 3 When the foolish took their lamps, they took no oil with them; 4 but the wise took flasks of oil with their lamps. 5 As the bridegroom was delayed, all of them became drowsy and slept. 6 But at midnight there was a shout, ‘Look! Here is the bridegroom! Come out to meet him.’ 7 Then all those bridesmaids got up and trimmed their lamps. 8 The foolish said to the wise, ‘Give us some of your oil, for our lamps are going out.’ 9 But the wise replied, ‘No! there will not be enough for you and for us; you had better go to the dealers and buy some for yourselves.’ 10 And while they went to buy it, the bridegroom came, and those who were ready went with him into the wedding banquet; and the door was shut. 11 Later the other bridesmaids came also, saying, ‘Lord, lord, open to us.’ 12 But he replied, ‘Truly I tell you, I do not know you.’ 13 Keep awake therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour.


Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway
Don't block up the hall...
There's a battle outside
And it is a ragin'
It'll soon shake your windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a changin'.
--Bob Dylan

Our country last week finished with its semi-annual national vote,
electing congresspeople and Senators to serve society. 
The question we all have is just what kind of society they will serve. We live in momentous—and I might say dark—political times. Change is needed. Whether these elections bring about the social change this country needs will be seen. 

Perhaps you are like me and saw a few glimmers of hope:
our sister city Richmond stood up and voted down the slate of candidates put up by its resident megalo-corporation Chevron. 
And Proposition 47 passed in the state,reducing some of the harsher sentences for non-violent crime. Harsh and mandatory sentencing has been enacted more and more in the last generation,
seeming to reflect a sour and punitive mood in this country, attempting to use the prisons to solve social problems.  Proposition 47 may change that trend.

Also this week, it was reported that religious groups in Israel are intensifying their advocacy to demolish the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem in order to build the Third Temple to Israel’s Religion.[1] Such a move risks World War III, but that does not stop some Zionist Christians from enabling such an act of destructive political theater.  The intent is fanatical: it would structure the performance of rituals mooted by Christian sacraments and innovations introduced by the Jewish synagogues. 
Yet the Hebrew Scriptures never speak of a third temple. I think this is a foolish virgin’s task spoken of in today’s parable for Christians whatever their politics. It seems destined to be a project to restore the public performance of ritual that shows others how pious one is, without necessarily acting for justice or mercy.

Also this week, a 90 year old man in Ft. Lauderdale, Arnold Abbott, was jailed and faces 60 days in jail and a fine for feeding the homeless in a public space,[2]
and certain people began claiming that feminism requires imprisoning men who catcall women in public.[3] 
This punitive mood of criminalizing poverty and bad manners gives us Christians who are tasked with visiting those in prison and feeding the hungry more to think about and more to accomplish. 
God, hear our prayers that we are up to that task ordained by your son, Jesus Christ, to be a light for the dispossessed, the imprisoned, and the hungry.

The Gospel writers Matthew and Luke describe Jesus’ living ministry that detail his instructions to his followers. For Luke, Jesus’s first public act is to proclaim release to the captives,
good news and light to the poor, healing for the sick, sight to the blind,and relief to the oppressed (cf Psalm 146).

Luke’s Jesus teaches through parables of the Kingdom a subversive politics that call to account both economic injustices and the worship and privileging of accumulated wealth that have been keeping the oppressed poor, sick, and imprisoned. 
Matthew’s portrayal of Jesus’ parables of the Kingdom complement Luke’s concern with the poor and oppressed by naming his opposition to the empty and formulaic concerns of ritual and body purity in certain sectors of Judea's religion located in Herod's temple. 

Matthew’s Jesus engages in a book long polemic against his opponents the Pharisees who were concerned with washings, sacrifices, and exclusion of the impure from community.
For Matthew’s Jesus, the Pharisees represent  a failure to bring in what the prophet Isaiah noted was the task of Israel to act as light to the world (Is 49.6).  Israel’s task was to bring the message of God’s Law of love to the gentiles. 

At earlier times, the Israelite Temple had a redistributive function: it took the submission of grains, herbs and animals for sacrifice and then redistributed the nourishment.  
But in Jesus’ polemic against the Temple, he condemns the Temple’s Court of the Gentiles, where outsiders to Jewish faith were admitted to learn of Israel’s witness to the One God of Creation. The Court of Gentiles had by Jesus’s time become a den of thieves and money changers, an alternative method of distribution of resources. 

Matthew is not quite as explicit as Luke about the economic injustices tolerated by the Jerusalem establishment,
but today’s parable about the Wise and Foolish Bridesmaids I believe demonstrates a powerful critique and judgment about neglecting the weightier matters of bringing the Law of love to Light in the World at large.

Just prior to our Parable of the Bridesmaids, Matthew has made explicit who Jesus’s opponents are and how they are subject to being driven from their place in the dawning Kingdom of Heaven. 
Two chapters earlier, Jesus proclaims a series of Woes against the scribes and Pharisees who tithe at the temple, fulfilling the ritual without fulfilling the Spirit of justice.

Mt 23.13 “But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you lock people out of the kingdom of heaven. For you do not go in yourselves, and when others are going in, you stop them…
Mt 23.23 “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint, dill, and cummin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faith.

Woe renders the Hebrew word applied to a person or group who are being judged by God.  Woe is what you receive when you may anticipate wrath and isolation. The Pharisees “lock out” the people from the Kingdom of Heaven, yet in a reversal this is the very fate of the Foolish Bridesmaids in today’s parable. The Foolish Bridesmaids run out of oil, then the Bridegroom arrives while the foolish bridesmaids leave their posts to purchase oil for their lamps in the marketplace, and they themselves are then locked out of the Wedding Feast, symbolizing the onset of New Kingdom of Heaven.

I think to understand this parable it is important to identify themes and statements in this parable and contrast them with other statements of Jesus which seem elsewhere to conflict.
For the English translation “Bridesmaid,” the Greek uses Parthenos, which is a young virgin woman.  
David Henson gives a useful summary of the polarities and antimonies in this parable compared with other New Testament teachings: [4]

“At that time the kingdom of heaven will be like ten virgins who took their lamps and went out to meet the bridegroom.
Five of them were foolish and five were wise.”

(1 Cor 3.18)— “But if you think that you are wise in this age, you should become fools so that you may become wise. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God.”

The foolish ones took their lamps but did not take any oil with them. The wise, however, took oil in jars along with their lamps. The bridegroom was a long time in coming, and they all became drowsy and fell asleep.

(Mt 26)— In the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus came to his disciples and found them sleeping, and he said to Peter, “So, could you not stay awake with me one hour?”

At midnight the cry rang out: “Here’s the bridegroom! Come out to meet him!”

Then all the virgins woke up and trimmed their lamps. The foolish ones said to the wise, “Give us some of your oil; our lamps are going out.”

(Is 42.3) — A smoldering wick he will not snuff out

“No,” they replied, “there may not be enough for both us and you.”
(Mt 5.42)— Give to everyone who begs from you, and do not refuse anyone who wants to borrow from you. 

“Instead, go to those who sell oil and buy some for yourselves.”
(Mt 19.21) – Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”

But while they were on their way to buy the oil, the bridegroom arrived.

(Rev. 22.5)– In the city of God, they will not need the light of a lamp, for the Lord God will give them light.

The virgins who were ready went in with him to the wedding banquet.

(Mt 19.30)–– But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will be first.

And the door was shut.

(Mt 23)– “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the kingdom of heaven in men’s faces. –
Later the others also came. “Sir! Sir!” they said. “Open the door for us!”

But he replied, “I tell you the truth, I don’t know you.”

(Prov 21.13)— If a man shuts his ears to the cry of the poor, he too will cry out and not be answered.

You can see as we read the parable of the Foolish Virgin Bridesmaids that the story contains language and examples opposed to the wisdom of Proverbs and Jesus’s instructions elsewhere in Matthew. The squabbling by the Bridesmaids does not reflect Kingdom of God values.  The Bridesmaids are caught in an ethic of religious competition, self-justification, and the scarcity of moral goods.

How do we make sense of this?

I think to make sense of this parable,
we have to situate it in Matthew’s polemic against the Pharisees.
Note that the authentic church is not being addressed, but rather the Bridesmaids or Virgins.  Israel saw itself as the Bride of Yahweh, the Lord, and the Church has from its earliest the tradition of identifying itself with the Bride of Christ. 

But the Bride is not a character in the parable. It is the Bridegroom who is noted as being late by virtue of the expectation of the bridesmaid virgins. The Bride is not in view. This parable is not intended for the authentic bride—authentic Israel or the authentic church. Instead, this is a story of Wisdom and Foolishness displayed by the Bridesmaids who are the servants of the Wedding Party—the virgin bridesmaids are the purity obsessed Pharisees.

Pharisees back then like Christian pharisees today were motivated by issues of competitive personal and ritual purity, yet Jesus noted earlier that some neglected the weightier matters of the law like justice, and shut others from the Kingdom of Heaven by their foolish emphases.  Yet some Bridesmaids in this parable are called wise--they have attended to wisdom: they are the ones with oil enough to bring light to assist the way of the approaching Wedding Party. 

I think it is clear that these Pharisees have done works of light so that they have light for their task of welcoming in the Kingdom of God.  The wise bridesmaids are servants of the Wedding Feast enjoined with alighting the path for the welcome invitees of the Bridegroom.  They are servants of the Bride, and they are subject to being let go and shut out if they foolishly neglect their task.

The foolish Pharisees have neglected their task to give light,
which are the good works that enable the invited people of God—the excluded and oppressed-- to welcome the Bridegroom.  
They have hypocritically kept the empty and futile lamps of their ritual service and have neglected their duties to be prepared to give light to the wedding guests.  They are foolish not only in that they have neglected their task to provide light  but foolishly think that they can obtain that light by a marketplace or commercial action. 
By leaving their posts to enter the marketplace, they are shut out from the Wedding Feast, the inaugural of the Kingdom.

This parable, then, is a parable of reversal and judgment. 
The scarcity ethic of the squabbling bridesmaids leads the foolish to seek a remedy in the marketplace, where scarcity ethics and false consciousness run even hotter. This is not a parable where we in the church lose our salvation by a loss of our faith in sleeping, but instead teaches us that empty ritual without the good works that enable the religious to shine as a light to the outcasts is foolish.  This is an illustration whereby those who seek justification by ritual or sterile religious performance  and ritual purification neglect the weightier tasks of mission. The foolish bridesmaids will be excluded on the basis of their own ethics of scarcity and exclusion. 

By the measure we judge, so too will we be judged. (Mt 7.2). This is a message for today, not fighting the battles of 2000 years ago.

I wonder, like Henson, whether the foolish virgins who had run out of oil, if they had not removed to the marketplace but had instead stayed in the dark by their posts, would have found mercy and access into the wedding feast. If religious performance is justified apart from charitable service, perhaps indeed. If faith without works is dead, as the Letter of James states, perhaps not. But works in the marketplace devoid of merciful acts of charity and neighborliness is clearly shut out of the Wedding Feast Kingdom of God.

I think, however, that this parable has much to instruct us in hope. 
I have family members who deny having faith but who practice politics and acts of charity and good will to the poor, homeless, and oppressed. They do not recognize Jesus as their Lord, but they recognize the Wisdom of the Proverbs exemplified by Jesus:
   
Prov 19. 17      Whoever is kind to the poor lends to the LORD,
    and will be repaid in full.
Prov 28.    26      Those who trust in their own wits are fools;
    but those who walk in wisdom come through safely.
    27      Whoever gives to the poor will lack nothing,
    but one who turns a blind eye will get many a curse.

Perhaps these family members and others who practice a politics of inclusion and sustenance for the poor and oppressed will be admitted into the eternal Kingdom of God for their commitment to the Bridegroom’s wisdom and preferential invitation to outcasts.
Perhaps in their visitation of the imprisoned and their feeding of the poor, they have supplied the lamps of their life with sufficient oil.  They may not be confessionally of the bridal church,
but they are bridesmaids of the wisdom who have prepared the way for the wedding guests to arrive. For that, they for their wisdom and good works may themselves be ushered into the Wedding Feast as they have lived lives of wisdom and service. 

It was once asked of Christian missionary, E. Stanley Jones:
Will Gandhi be in heaven?

But this is also a parable of warning for those confident of their invitation but foolish in the preparations for it. For those Bridesmaids-Virgins who are obsessed with ritual body purity without the purifying oil of mercy and kindness to the displaced and oppressed,  they will be shut out of the Wedding Feast just as the Super Religious currently shut out of our churches those whose sexual and performance standards don’t match their own practices. For those pharisaic fools for purity lacking charity and restorative acts of justice, this parable suggests to me that Matthew felt they should expect a reversal on the day of judgment.

I think of the foolishness of some in government who posture in the rituals of the church by attending prayer breakfasts prior to voting the defunding of food stamps.  Who turn away poor, oppressed, and homeless children at the borders while invoking their supposed purity of Christian family values. These are political cruelties camouflaged by politicized religiosity.  Pharisees of the Christian kind give religious cover for oppressive politics.

Jesus told us that the sexually impure prostitute and vocationally impure tax collector were entering into the Kingdom of Heaven prior to washed on the outside, dirty on the inside ritual religionist.
The career of the Apostle Paul gives us evidence of this need for conversion of attitudes with regards to the inner condition versus the outer ritual of performed purity. Note how Paul changes his attitude to his Pharisaic purity and considers it the “rubbish” (Greek has sense of "dung") of his preconversion life.

In Phil 3, he writes,
4If anyone else has reason to be confident in the flesh, I have more: 5 circumcised on the eighth day, a member of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew born of Hebrews; as to the law, a Pharisee; 6 as to zeal, a persecutor of the church; as to righteousness under the law, blameless.
7 Yet whatever gains I had, these I have come to regard as loss because of Christ. 8 More than that, I regard everything as loss because of the surpassing value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things, and I regard them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ.

After his changed inner conviction, Paul ceases to be concerned with the ritual purity, but instead is focused on the poor and to those he must bring the light of the Gospel.

In 2 Cor 8 he speaks of his task to organize a collection for the poor saints of the Kingdom.  He provides not only the light of wisdom, but the light of sustenance for the impoverished. Paul has gained a purity of wisdom, having left behind his devotion to the ritual purity of outward posturing. 

Once a bridesmaid Pharisee serving the death dealing Ritualistic Temple that served the fatted sheep in neglect of the starving (Ezek 34), Paul leaves foolishness behind with his discovery of the wisdom of serving God’s Kingdom, a wisdom that reverses expectations:

Keep your eyes wide, the chance won't come again
And don't speak too soon for the wheel's still in spin
And there's no tellin' who that it's namin'
For the loser now might be later to win
For the times they are a-changin'

Paul’s times were changing. His politics and ritual changed with it. 
From self-justifying foolishness to other-directed wisdom. 
From ritual oppression to radical inclusion.

Have you been given an empty lamp by your religion? 

Fill it with wisdom, which is not just knowledge, but made true and real by the acts of bringing light to those on the way--
light and strength for the displaced and oppressed to find their way to Jesus our Lord. "Knowledge is a rumor until it lives in muscle."[6]

Purity is not about scrubbing our faces obsessively until they shine in the sight of others, purity is about emitting light to those in darkness so they can find their way to the promised land.  It is a relational act.

Purity is not a scarce resource.  It is not a competitive ethic. 
It is not about being admired for our inner light, but for our willingness to share with others Christ’s light that we have been given as a gift.

May it be so for our leaders.

May it be so for you and me.         





[1] See eg. http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/04/10/israeli-institute-prepares-priests-for-jerusalems-third-temple
[2] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/90yearold-arnold-abbott-vows-to-keep-feeding-the-homeless-despite-facing-jail-9844237.html  For Ft. Lauderdale's mayor's response to criticism, he is quoted at http://twofriarsandafool.com/2014/11/fort-lauderdales-problem/
[3] https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/10/against-carceral-feminism/
[4]http://www.patheos.com/blogs/davidhenson/2014/11/the-breaking-of-the-bridesmaids-how-scripture-undermines-a-parable/
[5] http://www.leroygarrett.org/restorationreview/article.htm?rr30_10/rr30_10c.htm&30&10&1988
[6] Proverb attributed to African Guinea.